How It Works
Research & Curation
Finding, annotating, and sharing high-quality literature, guidelines, and resources across all fields of knowledge — so good work doesn't stay buried in one person's inbox.
What It Looks Like
Finding and Sharing What's Worth Knowing
Members surface high-quality literature, guidelines, articles, and recorded lectures, then annotate and tag them so the rest of the community can actually find and use them — not just link-dropping, but curation with context.
Where It Happens
The Knowledge Library
Submitted resources — articles, guidelines, case studies, and recorded lectures — live in the searchable Knowledge Library, filterable by content type, specialty, and career stage (Student-Friendly, Early Career, Advanced, or All Levels). The Research & Resources forum is the discussion space for surfacing and debating what's worth curating next.
Quality & Trust
Reviewed Before It's Published
New submissions enter a review queue and are checked by a Library Steward — a volunteer member with moderation access — for quality, correct tagging, and de-identification before going live. Case studies require an explicit confirmation that no identifiable patient information is included. Once published, any member can flag a resource as inaccurate or outdated for a Steward to re-review.
Earning Knowledge Hours
Recognized for the Time It Takes
Curating a resource earns 0.5 Knowledge Hours once confirmed — by an admin, since solo curation has no counterpart to confirm it directly. Knowledge Hours are a recognition system, not a paywall: your full access to NASIHA never depends on your balance.
Get Involved
Ready to take part? Here’s where this happens on NASIHA.
